SNAP payment error rates by state
State SNAP improper payment rates range from under 4% to over 24%, adding up to more than $10B in improper payments every year. Under H.R. 1, states with higher error rates face tiered cost-sharing obligations starting in FY 2028. Strengthening payment accuracy is a bipartisan priority, and this interactive map shows where states stand today.
Last updated: February 2026
SNAP payment error rates (USDA's official measure of improper payments) track the percentage of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits issued incorrectly each year, whether as overpayments to households or underpayments that leave eligible families short. These rates matter because they directly affect the accuracy and long-term sustainability of a program that delivers over $94 billion annually to more than 42 million Americans. Even small percentage-point differences translate into billions of dollars, and strengthening payment accuracy is a bipartisan priority for keeping SNAP reliable for the people who depend on it.
H.R. 1, signed into law in July 2025, establishes a tiered cost-sharing framework that holds states financially accountable based on their error rates. Starting in FY 2028, states with error rates of 6–8% must cover 5% of their total benefit allotments, states at 8–10% cover 10%, and states at or above 10% cover 15%. States below 6% owe no cost share. With 43 states and the District of Columbia currently at or above the 6% threshold (FY 2024), strengthening payment accuracy is a bipartisan priority for state human services agencies nationwide.
Across all states and the District of Columbia, error rates currently range from 3.28% (South Dakota) to 24.66% (Alaska), with a national average of 10.93%. The interactive map below shows official USDA FNS FY 2024 data for all 50 states and Washington, D.C. Click any state to see its detailed error rate breakdown and estimated H.R. 1 cost-share exposure.
Interactive error rate map
Hover over any state to see its error rate, or click to view detailed information. States are color-coded by error rate severity.
Data based on USDA FNS FY 2024 Quality Control reports. Cost-share estimates based on H.R. 1 (P.L. 119-21) tiered provisions, Section 10105.
State-by-state data
Click any column header to sort. All 50 states and the District of Columbia are included.
| # | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | 24.66% | 92K | $37M |
| 2 | District of Columbia | 17.38% | 131K | $48M |
| 3 | Georgia | 15.65% | 1.6M | $477M |
| 4 | Florida | 15.13% | 3.0M | $982M |
| 5 | New Mexico | 14.61% | 430K | $154M |
| 6 | New Jersey | 14.33% | 764K | $289M |
| 7 | Massachusetts | 14.1% | 889K | $393M |
| 8 | New York | 14.09% | 2.8M | $1.1B |
| 9 | Oregon | 14.06% | 765K | $239M |
| 10 | Maryland | 13.64% | 674K | $225M |
| 11 | Delaware | 12.37% | 131K | $38M |
| 12 | Rhode Island | 12.29% | 157K | $51M |
| 13 | Illinois | 11.56% | 1.8M | $670M |
| 14 | Virginia | 11.5% | 821K | $265M |
| 15 | California | 10.98% | 5.1M | $1.9B |
| 16 | Oklahoma | 10.87% | 618K | $226M |
| 17 | Pennsylvania | 10.76% | 1.8M | $640M |
| 18 | Mississippi | 10.69% | 545K | $126M |
| 19 | Maine | 10.26% | 193K | $55M |
| 20 | Connecticut | 10.25% | 383K | $134M |
| 21 | North Carolina | 10.21% | 1.3M | $440M |
| 22 | Kansas | 9.98% | 233K | $41M |
| 23 | Colorado | 9.97% | 533K | $130M |
| 24 | Arkansas | 9.56% | 378K | $52M |
| 25 | Michigan | 9.53% | 1.4M | $306M |
| 26 | Indiana | 9.52% | 689K | $144M |
| 27 | Tennessee | 9.47% | 924K | $162M |
| 28 | West Virginia | 9.43% | 291K | $57M |
| 29 | Missouri | 9.42% | 756K | $151M |
| 30 | South Carolina | 9.25% | 668K | $129M |
| 31 | Kentucky | 9.11% | 612K | $115M |
| 32 | Ohio | 9.01% | 1.5M | $318M |
| 33 | Minnesota | 8.98% | 462K | $86M |
| 34 | Montana | 8.89% | 107K | $17M |
| 35 | Arizona | 8.84% | 913K | $202M |
| 36 | Alabama | 8.32% | 782K | $173M |
| 37 | Texas | 8.32% | 3.5M | $721M |
| 38 | North Dakota | 7.91% | 57K | $6M |
| 39 | New Hampshire | 7.57% | 84K | $8M |
| 40 | Hawaii | 6.68% | 172K | $37M |
| 41 | Louisiana | 6.62% | 836K | $95M |
| 42 | Iowa | 6.14% | 328K | $26M |
| 43 | Washington | 6.06% | 915K | $96M |
| 44 | Nevada | 5.94% | 434K | $0 |
| 45 | Utah | 5.74% | 213K | $0 |
| 46 | Nebraska | 5.5% | 186K | $0 |
| 47 | Vermont | 5.13% | 75K | $0 |
| 48 | Wyoming | 5.12% | 31K | $0 |
| 49 | Wisconsin | 4.47% | 638K | $0 |
| 50 | Idaho | 3.59% | 192K | $0 |
| 51 | South Dakota | 3.28% | 100K | $0 |
Understanding state-by-state variations
Highest error rate states
The five states with the highest SNAP payment error rates are Alaska (24.66%), District of Columbia (17.38%), Georgia (15.65%), Florida (15.13%), and New Mexico (14.61%). These states share common challenges: large caseloads relative to available administrative staff, legacy eligibility systems that lack automated verification, and complex state eligibility rules layered on top of federal requirements. Together, they face an estimated $1.7B in combined H.R. 1 cost-share exposure.
Lowest error rate states
The five states with the lowest error rates are South Dakota (3.28%), Idaho (3.59%), Wisconsin (4.47%), Wyoming (5.12%), and Vermont (5.13%). These states tend to have smaller caseloads, more streamlined eligibility processes, and earlier investment in modernized case management technology. Their success demonstrates that low error rates are achievable with the right combination of process design and technology.
What causes high error rates?
SNAP improper payments stem from systemic issues, not individual failures. The most common causes include incorrect income calculations during eligibility determination, outdated household composition data, failure to account for deductions and exemptions, delayed processing of recertification paperwork, and manual data entry mistakes in legacy eligibility systems. States with high caseload-to-worker ratios are particularly vulnerable: eligibility workers managing hundreds of cases a month have less time to verify each application against every data source. USDA FNS Quality Control analyses consistently identify income reporting (both earned and unearned) as the leading source of improper payments, followed by expense deductions and household composition.
Regional patterns and trends
Error rates show some regional patterns, though performance varies considerably within every region. Several Plains and Mountain West states post the lowest rates in the country, including South Dakota (3.28%), Idaho (3.59%), Wisconsin (4.47%), Wyoming (5.12%), Vermont (5.13%), Nebraska (5.50%), Utah (5.74%), and Nevada (5.94%). Many Southeastern states trend higher, with Georgia (15.65%) and Florida (15.13%) well above the national average, a pattern often attributed to large SNAP caseloads, higher poverty rates, and historically lower investment in administrative technology. New England and the Mid-Atlantic are mixed: Vermont sits among the lowest, while Massachusetts (14.10%), New Jersey (14.33%), New York (14.09%), and Rhode Island (12.29%) all sit well above the national average. Alaska has the highest rate nationally at 24.66%.
How Savor Snap helps strengthen payment accuracy
Savor Snap partners with state human services agencies to strengthen SNAP payment accuracy across the country. Our work rests on two pillars:
Applied research with state agencies
We research the operational and policy drivers of SNAP payment errors (the root causes) through direct work with administrators, supervisors, and eligibility staff, and advise on the interventions most likely to reduce them. A cross-state findings report synthesizing this work is forthcoming in mid-2026.
Human-centered design of software
Where research points to a clear, under-addressed opportunity to improve accuracy, we design purpose-built software, including AI tools, built around the people who administer the program every day.
Reduces H.R. 1 cost-share risk
By helping states strengthen payment accuracy, we help reduce the cost-sharing obligations H.R. 1 imposes on higher-error jurisdictions starting in FY 2028.
Protects 42M Americans
Accurate payments mean eligible families receive the correct benefit amount. No overpayments that trigger clawbacks, no underpayments that leave households short. Strengthening payment accuracy protects the nutrition safety net for the people who rely on it.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about SNAP improper payment rates, H.R. 1 cost-sharing, and state performance.
What is a SNAP payment error rate?+
A SNAP payment error rate measures the percentage of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits that are issued incorrectly, either overpayments to households or underpayments to eligible ones. These rates are determined through the USDA's Quality Control (QC) review process, which audits a statistically representative sample of cases in each state. The FY 2024 combined error rate includes both over-issuance (9.26% nationally) and under-issuance (1.67% nationally) improper payments.
Which state has the highest SNAP error rate?+
Based on the most recent USDA FNS FY 2024 Quality Control data, Alaska has the highest SNAP payment error rate at 24.66%. This is significantly above the national average of 10.93%. High error rates can result from complex eligibility rules, staffing shortages, outdated technology systems, and high caseload volumes.
What is the national average SNAP error rate?+
The national average SNAP payment error rate for FY 2024 is 10.93%, comprising a 9.26% overpayment rate and a 1.67% underpayment rate. This means roughly 1 in 9 SNAP benefit calculations contain some form of improper payment. South Dakota has the lowest rate at 3.28%, while Alaska has the highest at 24.66%. The national average is calculated using a dollar-weighted methodology by USDA FNS.
What are H.R. 1 cost-sharing provisions?+
H.R. 1, signed into law in July 2025, establishes a tiered cost-sharing framework for states based on their SNAP payment error rates, taking effect in FY 2028. States with error rates below 6% owe no cost share. States at 6–8% share 5% of benefit costs, those at 8–10% share 10%, and states at or above 10% share 15% of their total benefit allotments. These provisions are designed to incentivize states to invest in payment accuracy and process improvements.
How are SNAP error rates calculated?+
SNAP error rates are calculated through the USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) Quality Control (QC) system. Each state conducts monthly reviews of a random sample of active SNAP cases and negative actions (denials and terminations). Federal reviewers then re-review a subsample for accuracy. The error rate is computed as the total dollar value of over-issuances and under-issuances divided by the total dollar value of benefits issued, expressed as a percentage.
What happens if a state exceeds the error rate threshold?+
Under H.R. 1, states are subject to tiered cost-sharing starting in FY 2028 based on their error rate. States at 6–8% share 5% of benefit costs, those at 8–10% share 10%, and states at or above 10% share 15%. However, H.R. 1 includes a temporary delay for states with the highest error rates. If a state's FY 2025 payment error rate exceeds 13.33%, it is exempt from cost-sharing until FY 2029. If its FY 2026 rate still exceeds 13.33%, the exemption extends to FY 2030. This means the highest-error states may not face cost-sharing obligations for up to two additional years; if their error rate falls from above 13.33% to between 6% and 13.33% during that period, cost-sharing is triggered at the applicable tier rate. The cost-share estimates shown on this page reflect each state's current tier obligation based on FY 2024 error rates and do not account for this temporary delay provision.
How can states reduce SNAP error rates?+
States can strengthen SNAP payment accuracy through several strategies: investing in modern eligibility verification technology, implementing improper-payment detection systems powered by machine learning, improving caseworker training and support, simplifying application and recertification processes, and conducting targeted quality improvement reviews. Savor Snap partners with state human services agencies on applied research and human-centered software, including AI tools, that help eligibility staff and supervisors catch improper payments before they reach families.
How often are SNAP error rates updated?+
The USDA FNS publishes official SNAP error rates annually, typically releasing data from the prior fiscal year. The QC review process runs continuously throughout the year, but the compiled and verified state-level error rates are released on an annual cycle. States receive preliminary data before the official publication, allowing them to begin corrective actions. This map is updated when new official data becomes available from USDA FNS.
Data sources & methodology
The error rate data presented on this page is derived from the USDA Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) Quality Control (QC) FY 2024 reports. The QC system requires each state to review a statistically valid random sample of active SNAP cases and negative actions each month. Federal reviewers then re-examine a subsample for accuracy, and the resulting error rates are published annually. 99%+ of SNAP improper payments are accidental: the product of system and process failures, not fraud.
Error rates represent the combined over-issuance and under-issuance rate, calculated as the total dollar value of incorrect payments divided by total benefits issued. The national average of 10.93% comprises a 9.26% overpayment rate and a 1.67% underpayment rate, calculated using USDA's dollar-weighted methodology.
Estimated H.R. 1 cost shares are calculated using the tiered framework established by H.R. 1: states below 6% owe nothing; 6–8% owe 5% of total benefit allotments; 8–10% owe 10%; and states at or above 10% owe 15%. Benefit issuance figures are from USDA FNS FY 2024 data. These cost-share estimates are projections based on current rates applied to FY 2028 enforcement and may differ from actual assessments.
Cost-share formula:
State Cost Share = [State SNAP Benefit Allotments] × [Applicable Tier Rate]
Tier rates: <6% = 0% | 6–8% = 5% | 8–10% = 10% | ≥10% = 15%
Example: California (error rate 10.98%, FY 2024 SNAP benefits ~$12.4B): At the ≥10% tier → 15% cost share → ~$1.9B estimated annual obligation.
SNAP recipient counts are approximate estimates based on the most recent USDA FNS participation data. All figures are subject to revision as new data becomes available. We update this page when USDA FNS releases new official error rate data, typically on an annual cycle.
Sources: USDA FNS FY 2024 QC Payment Error Rate Reports; USDA FNS FY 2024 SNAP Benefit Allotment Data; H.R. 1 (119th Congress), SNAP cost-sharing provisions.
Get the full SNAP error rate analysis
Download our detailed PDF report with state-by-state analysis, estimated H.R. 1 cost-sharing obligations, and actionable recommendations for strengthening payment accuracy. A cross-state findings report synthesizing our applied research with administrators, supervisors, and eligibility staff is forthcoming in mid-2026. Subscribers receive it first.
No spam. We'll only send you the report and occasional SNAP policy updates.
Embed this map
Want to feature this interactive SNAP error rate map on your website or report? Copy the embed code below.
<iframe src="https://savorsnap.org/embed/snap-error-map" width="100%" height="500" frameborder="0" title="SNAP Error Rates by State"></iframe>